Skip to main content

Litigating Bad Faith in Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Claims

Austin Mehr is committed to continuing education and keeping interested individuals up to date on areas of law that he frequently practices. On Thursday, March 24, 2016, Austin is scheduled to be a speaker for the National Business Institute's Live Audio Webinar "Litigating Bad Faith in Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Claims."

For more information, including CLE credit in your state, how to sign up for the webinar, and associated fees, please visit National Business Institute's website here.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers

Austin Mehr of Mehr, Fairbanks & Peterson Trial Lawyers received an invitation on July 17, 2017, to The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyers. As stated in his invitation: “Membership in The National Trial Lawyers is by invitation only and extended to those attorneys who exemplify superior qualifications, trial results and leadership in their respective state based upon objective and uniformly applied criteria.”  Congratulations, Austin!

Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Standard for Insurance Bad Faith

In Hollaway v. Direct General Ins. Co. of Miss., 497 S.W.3d 733 (Ky. 2016), the Kentucky Supreme Court addressed the first substantive insurance bad faith case to come before it in ten years.  In the September 22, 2016, decision, the Court affirmed a summary judgment granted by Fayette Chief Regional Circuit Judge Thomas Clark, who had found an absence of evidence of bad faith on the part of the insurer.  The Court had no trouble agreeing with Judge Clark, who had found that liability for the disputed parking lot fender bender that gave rise to the claim was never reasonably clear.  Without clearly proving liability for the accident, or the injuries stemming from it, the plaintiff could not prevail on a claim of bad faith, which requires that an insurer be obligated to pay under the terms of the policy. There are three key takeaways from Hollaway. Most importantly, the Court rejected the idea that a claimant must prove an “evil motive” on the part of the insurance company.  As practi…