Skip to main content

2014 Pennsylvania Supreme Court Decision Allows Assignment of Bad Faith Claims

"The right to make assignments protects the most financially vulnerable policyholders from opportunistic breaches by their insurance companies at the crucial moments when policyholders rightfully expect their insurers to protect them as their fiduciaries." Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Wolfe, 105 A.3d 1181, 1186, n. 6 (Pa. 2014) (See Brief for Amicus United Policyholders at 30 (United Policyholders Amicus Brief Access)).

In December 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that insured individuals are allowed to assign any bad faith claim they possess against their insurance company. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Wolfe, 105 A.3d 1181 (Pa. 2014). United Policyholders filed an Amicus Brief that is cited throughout the Court's opinion. This is a favorable decision that helps further protect the rights of insured individuals, and those whom they may be liable against, from the unfair actions of insurance companies. The facts of this case includes an insurance company's (Allstate) insured who assigned all rights and claims which he might have against the insurance company to the individual to whom he was liable for hitting in a motor vehicle accident while driving under the influence.

See Wolfe v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 790 F.3d 487 (3rd Cir. 2015) for subsequent case activity.

 Check out the links below for more information on the Pennsylvania Court's decision.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers

Austin Mehr of Mehr, Fairbanks & Peterson Trial Lawyers received an invitation on July 17, 2017, to The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyers. As stated in his invitation: “Membership in The National Trial Lawyers is by invitation only and extended to those attorneys who exemplify superior qualifications, trial results and leadership in their respective state based upon objective and uniformly applied criteria.”  Congratulations, Austin!

Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Standard for Insurance Bad Faith

In Hollaway v. Direct General Ins. Co. of Miss., 497 S.W.3d 733 (Ky. 2016), the Kentucky Supreme Court addressed the first substantive insurance bad faith case to come before it in ten years.  In the September 22, 2016, decision, the Court affirmed a summary judgment granted by Fayette Chief Regional Circuit Judge Thomas Clark, who had found an absence of evidence of bad faith on the part of the insurer.  The Court had no trouble agreeing with Judge Clark, who had found that liability for the disputed parking lot fender bender that gave rise to the claim was never reasonably clear.  Without clearly proving liability for the accident, or the injuries stemming from it, the plaintiff could not prevail on a claim of bad faith, which requires that an insurer be obligated to pay under the terms of the policy. There are three key takeaways from Hollaway. Most importantly, the Court rejected the idea that a claimant must prove an “evil motive” on the part of the insurance company.  As practi…