Skip to main content

Factors to Consider When Determining Whether or Not to File an Insurance Claim

Sometimes, in the event of an accident, tragedy, or personal disaster, filing an insurance claim can be overwhelming and confusing. United Policyholders suggests these factors to consider before filing a claim so that you will be better prepared in determining whether or not to file a claim at a moment when it means the most. United Policyholders' advice includes:

To claim or not to claim...that is the question. To figure out if it makes financial sense to file an insurance claim you need to do a bit of research and a bit of math.

First the math: An obvious rule is don't file a claim if you're sure the damage is less than your deductible. If it is, you won't recover a dime from your insurer but the claim goes on your record and may put you in a higher risk/rate category - even if you didn't collect any benefits.
If you're not sure how much the damage is - try and figure it out before filing a claim - but don't wait too long. If you wait too long after a loss to notify your insurer - the insurer may complain that you "prejudiced" their interests by failing to notify them promptly. They may even deny the claim on that ground.

More math: If the damage is less than a few hundred above your deductible - again - probably not worth filing. Pay it out of pocket. Yes it's unfair to be penalized for using the insurance you've paid for. But because most states allow insurers to freely penalize their customers for filing claims - its up to you to protect yourself. Some states do limit the amount an insurer can surcharge you.

Now the research: Ask your agent point blank - how much will my rate go up if I file one, two or more claims? Does it matter how far apart they occur? Write down the answers and keep them with your insurance policy for future reference.

Now you can make an educated decision.
If damage is well above your deductible - by all means file it. That's why you pay for insurance. If your rate goes up as a result - complain in writing to the insurer, and to your state regulator - and confirm that the increase was legal and consistent with the rating plan they filed with the state.
If after doing your research you learn that your insurer will penalize you for filing even one claim, consider switching to a more customer-friendly insurance company that has fairer rules. Many insurers will not penalize you for filing just one claim - even if it was your fault.


Do you agree? Do you know any other factors that should be considered when deciding whether or not to file an insurance claim? Let us know below!

For the factors above, and other interesting articles, visit United Policyholders' website: www.uphelp.org. The above article can be found here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers

Austin Mehr of Mehr, Fairbanks & Peterson Trial Lawyers received an invitation on July 17, 2017, to The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyers. As stated in his invitation: “Membership in The National Trial Lawyers is by invitation only and extended to those attorneys who exemplify superior qualifications, trial results and leadership in their respective state based upon objective and uniformly applied criteria.”  Congratulations, Austin!

Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Standard for Insurance Bad Faith

In Hollaway v. Direct General Ins. Co. of Miss., 497 S.W.3d 733 (Ky. 2016), the Kentucky Supreme Court addressed the first substantive insurance bad faith case to come before it in ten years.  In the September 22, 2016, decision, the Court affirmed a summary judgment granted by Fayette Chief Regional Circuit Judge Thomas Clark, who had found an absence of evidence of bad faith on the part of the insurer.  The Court had no trouble agreeing with Judge Clark, who had found that liability for the disputed parking lot fender bender that gave rise to the claim was never reasonably clear.  Without clearly proving liability for the accident, or the injuries stemming from it, the plaintiff could not prevail on a claim of bad faith, which requires that an insurer be obligated to pay under the terms of the policy. There are three key takeaways from Hollaway. Most importantly, the Court rejected the idea that a claimant must prove an “evil motive” on the part of the insurance company.  As practi…